WEST VIRGINIA COURTS & JUDGES

WHERE IS THE JUSTICE ?

 Only one judge, thus far,  has been found guilty of wrongdoing by the courts and impeached by the West Virginia  Legislature. JAMES NED GRUBB OF LOGAN, WEST VIRGINIA

 See:   http://www.state.wv.us/wvsca/docs%5Cspring92%5C21200.htm

 HOW JUDGES BREAK THE LAW  (ALSO SEE: www.collusion.webs.com - By The Court )  

 

 

 

Judges break the law in a number of ways. 

They have a standard little bag of tricks, and they are all smart enough to know how to abuse them.

If you believe that all  judges are honest, you are sorely mistaken.

Here are the main ways they break the law:

Ignore the Law

One of the primary techniques used by corrupt judges is to simply ignore the law.  One party cites the law and overwhelming case law.  The other party doesn't have a leg to stand on.  The judge simply ignores the law and rules against the party that was legally right.

Cite Invalid Law

Sometimes a judge will feel like citation of case law is needed to support their ruling.  So, they cite a case that is in some way related, but they claim the case applies when it didn't. 

Lie about the Facts in Orders

Lying under oath is perjury.  Judges are always under oath, and a judge is supposed to never say or write anything that isn't true.  So, when a judge knowingly lies in orders for the purpose of ruling against a party for the judge's criminal reasons, it is a criminal violation of perjury.  Each such instance is a separate count. 

Ignore Issues

Another favourite of techniques are to simply ignore issues in orders.  They do not respond to motions on a timely basis, and then she takes many motions at once and rules on them.  This buries the fact that she ignored motions where her ruling could not possible be explained.  So, rather than make up an explanation, she just ignores those tough issues.

Conceal Evidence 

A really dishonest will simply conceal evidence.  If they have documents that will prove fraud by the other party and their attorney.  They simply conceal that evidence and refuse to allow it to see the light of day so their criminal efforts are not exposed.

Say Nothing in Orders

One of the favourite techniques is to say nothing.  They corruptly call an appeal "frivolous" and dismiss it with no explanation whatsoever.  Sometimes they write a page or two simply reciting history of the case, so it appears it is a real order, and then they write one sentence dismissing the appeal with no valid reason or explanation.

Due process is the legal principle that the government must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person according to the law. Due process holds the government subservient to the law of the land protecting individual persons from the state. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law it constitutes a due process violation which offends against the rule of law.

Natural justice is a term  that denotes specific procedural rights in the legal system and the systems of other nations based on it. The term natural justice is often retained as a general concept, it has largely been replaced and extended by the more general "duty to act fairly". What is required to fulfill this duty depends on the context in which the matter arises.

There are two rules that natural justice is concerned with. These are the rule against bias and the right to a fair hearing. The basis for the rule against bias is the need to maintain public confidence in the legal system. Bias can take the form of actual bias, imputed bias or apparent bias.

A person is barred from deciding any case in which he or she may be, or may fairly be suspected to be, biased. This principle embodies the basic concept of impartiality, and applies to courts of law, tribunals, arbitrators and all those having the duty to act judicially. A public authority has a duty to act judicially whenever it makes decisions that affect people's rights or interests, and not only when it applies some judicial-type procedure in arriving at decisions.

Bias may be actual, imputed or apparent. Actual bias is established where it is actually established that a decision-maker was prejudiced in favor of or against a party.

 DISCLAIMER

Articles that appear on this website are for information purposes only. The nature of the information in all of the articles is intended to provide GENERAL information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is posted with the understanding that THIS WEB SITE is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional person should be sought immediately.

LINKS : http://www.freedom-school.com/law/fraud-on-the-court-by-an-officer-of-the-court.html

ALSO SEE: http://www.corruptjudge.webs.com/ ,  

http://www.corruptcourts.webs.com/ ,

http://www.wvcourts1.webs.com/ ,

http://www.wvcourts2.webs.com/